Fig. 5: Iliamna terrace interpretations

Fault offset is the only explanation that is not contradicted by our data.
— We propose three different hypotheses to explain our terrace elevation data along Lake Iliamna.  Firstly, there may have been no crustal deformation (a) during lake-level decline.  This hypothesis fails to explain a large section of coast where no profiles show scarps as high as those further to the northeast.  Secondly, isostatic rebound might have tilted the lake over time (b) leading to older beaches being sloped along their length.  Though along two large sections of coast the uppermost scarp lies at roughly the same elevation, this might be coincidental, and the true highest scarp may have been eroded away on many of these profiles.  However this interpretation still fails to explain the location of the uppermost wave-cut scarp on profiles 10 and 11.  On profile 10, our survey did not reach the highest beach feature, and yet the hypothesis depicted here predicts it would.  On profile 11 the uppermost scarp lies well below the prediction, and the scarp is not tall enough to have removed some higher scarp.  Lastly, the terraces might be roughly flat, but offset by localized deformation on or over an active fault (c).  This hypothesis can explain all the data.

Attribution and Copyright info

By

Content on this page is available under a license.