Coal Fired Power Plants.kml normal #sn_ylw-pushpin1 highlight #sh_ylw-pushpin1 normal #sn_yellow-dot61 highlight #sn_yellow-dot60 normal #sn_ylw-pushpin highlight #sh_ylw-pushpin0 normal #sn_ylw-pushpin0 highlight #sh_ylw-pushpin Coal Fired Power Plants Existing PowerPlantPips Fort Wainwright power plant 20 Mw (Fort Wainwright) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in the 1940 20 Mw (Fort Wainwright) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in the 1940 20 Mw:

The Fort Wainwright Central Heat and Power Plant (CHPP) is the largest coal-fired power plant owned by the U.S. military. It was first constructed in the 1940's, and has been modified extensively over time. This co-generation plant uses around 230,000 tons of coal per year and can produces up to 20 Mw of electricity as well as steam for heating.

In 1999 this plant was fined over $16 million by the EPA for violation of the Clean Air Act, which at the time was the largest fine levied by the EPA against a Department of Defense installation. Around this same period, Fort Wainwright was designated as Superfund Site for contamination of soil and groundwater with coal, petroleum and pesticide wastes. However, the site is currently in compliance with EPA regulations. In 2007, an air-cooled condenser was added to the plant to the problem of generating ice fog near the cooling pond in the winter that affected visibility on the Richardson Highway.

]]>
-147.649353 64.825554 0 -0.156867 0 357.706482 relativeToGround #sn_yellow-dot6 -147.649094,64.825546,0
University of Alaska Fairbanks power plant 13 Mw (UAF) This coal fired power and steam plant was built in 1964. 13 Mw (UAF) This coal fired power and steam plant was built in 1964. 13 Mw:
This coal fired power plant was constructed in 1964. It uses approximately 60,000 tons of coal per year to supply all the electricity, hot water, and heat to the University.

]]>
-147.822296 64.85437 0 0.46 0 171.265366 relativeToGround #sn_yellow-dot6 -147.82225,64.85433999999999,0
Aurora Energy power plant 25 Mw (Aurora Energy) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952. 25 Mw (Aurora Energy) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952. 25 Mw:
This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952, and was acquired by Aurora Energy LLC (a subsidiary of Usibelli Coal Mine Inc.) in 1998.

This plant provides steam and hot water for approximately 165 consumers in Fairbanks, as well as generating up to 25 Mw of electricity which it sells to the Golden Valley Electric Association. It uses approximately 210,000 tons of coal per year.

On June 4th, 2009 this plant suffered a fire in the coal stockpiles and was not operating at capacity for a few weeks afterwards.

]]>
-147.735123 64.847992 0 -8.744348 0 392.372192 relativeToGround #sn_yellow-dot6 -147.735291,64.847466,0
Healy Coal power plant #1 25 Mw (Healy Coal Plant #1) 25 Mw (Healy Coal Plant #1) 25 Mw:
The Golden Valley Electric Association operates this "mine-mouth" coal-fired power plant in Healy, near the Usibelli coal mine. The facility was built in 1967 and is located just next to the newer Healy #2 "Clean Coal plant which is currently non-operational.

]]>
#sn_yellow-dot6 -148.949554,63.854836,0
Clear Air Force Station power plant 22.5 Mw (Clear AF Base) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1961. 22.5 Mw (Clear AF Base) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1961. 22.5 Mw
The coal fired power plant at Clear Air Force Station opened in 1961, and currently uses around 58,000 tons of coal per year. Known as a "co-generation" plant, it produces steam for heating as well as electricity. This plant is currently soliciting bids to upgrade and replace the coal crushers that are required for this type of "pulverized coal" operation.

]]>
-149.185028 64.291916 0 -10.053615 0 228.95192 relativeToGround #sn_yellow-dot6 -149.184677,64.29186199999999,0
Eielson Air Force Base power plant 25 Mw (Eielson Air Force Base) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1 25 Mw (Eielson Air Force Base) This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1 25 Mw:
This coal-fired power plant at Eielson Air Force base was constructed in 1951 and uses about 196,500 tons of coal per year to produce up to 25 Mw of electricity. In the winter the plant produces more than 380,000 pounds of steam per hour, two thirds of which is used to heat the base and the remainder to generate electricity. This plant also derives about 1% of its energy from burning waste paper.

]]>
-147.076294 64.671936 0 0.984294 0 406.463531 relativeToGround #sn_yellow-dot6 -147.07663,64.67186,0
PowerPlantOutlines Healy Coal Plant #1 This coal fired power plant has been operating since 1967 This coal fired power plant has been operating since 1967 25 Mw:
The Golden Valley Electric Association operates this "mine-mouth" coal-fired power plant in Healy, near the Usibelli coal mine. The facility was built in 1967 and is located just next to the newer Healy #2 "Clean Coal plant which is currently non-operational.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin131 1 -148.949219,63.855103,0 -148.949661,63.85525100000001,0 -148.950287,63.854778,0 -148.950623,63.854496,0 -148.950378,63.854439,0 -148.949921,63.854767,0 -148.949585,63.85468700000001,0 -148.949326,63.85487700000001,0 -148.949493,63.854931,0 -148.949219,63.855103,0
University of Alaska Fairbanks This coal fired power and steam plant was built in 1964. This coal fired power and steam plant was built in 1964. 13 Mw:
This coal fired power plant was constructed in 1964. It uses approximately 60,000 tons of coal per year to supply all the electricity, hot water, and heat to the University.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin_maps2 1 -147.822617,64.854454,0 -147.822647,64.854286,0 -147.821854,64.854248,0 -147.821808,64.854401,0 -147.822617,64.854454,0
Aurora Energy This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952. This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952. 25 Mw:
This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952, and was acquired by Aurora Energy LLC (a subsidiary of Usibelli Coal Mine Inc.) in 1998.

This plant provides steam and hot water for approximately 165 consumers in Fairbanks, as well as generating up to 25 Mw of electricity which it sells to the Golden Valley Electric Association. It uses approximately 210,000 tons of coal per year.

On June 4th, 2009 this plant suffered a fire in the coal stockpiles and was not operating at capacity for a few weeks afterwards.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin_maps 1 -147.735565,64.847809,0 -147.735764,64.847595,0 -147.736023,64.847404,0 -147.736069,64.847221,0 -147.734711,64.847145,0 -147.73465,64.847351,0 -147.734955,64.847725,0 -147.735565,64.847809,0
Eielson Air Force Base This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952. This plant also derives a This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1952. This plant also derives a 25 Mw:
This coal-fired power plant at Eielson Air Force base was constructed in 1951 and uses about 196,500 tons of coal per year to produce up to 25 Mw of electricity. In the winter the plant produces more than 380,000 pounds of steam per hour, two thirds of which is used to heat the base and the remainder to generate electricity. This plant also derives about 1% of its energy from burning waste paper.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin_maps0 1 -147.077728,64.672325,0 -147.077393,64.67195100000001,0 -147.077499,64.67192799999999,0 -147.077744,64.67188299999999,0 -147.077408,64.671516,0 -147.077118,64.671555,0 -147.076935,64.671402,0 -147.07666,64.67144,0 -147.076675,64.671494,0 -147.076538,64.671509,0 -147.076614,64.671616,0 -147.075668,64.671761,0 -147.07608,64.67216500000001,0 -147.076355,64.67214199999999,0 -147.076401,64.672264,0 -147.076294,64.672302,0 -147.076416,64.67242400000001,0 -147.076813,64.67237900000001,0 -147.076874,64.672417,0 -147.076965,64.67240099999999,0 -147.076797,64.672211,0 -147.076752,64.672211,0 -147.07663,64.672104,0 -147.077209,64.67202,0 -147.07753,64.672363,0 -147.077728,64.672325,0
Clear Airforce Base This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1961. This coal fired power and steam plant opened in 1961. 22.5 Mw
The coal fired power plant at Clear Air Force Station opened in 1961, and currently uses around 58,000 tons of coal per year. Known as a "co-generation" plant, it produces steam for heating as well as electricity. This plant is currently soliciting bids to upgrade and replace the coal crushers that are required for this type of "pulverized coal" operation.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin_maps3 1 -149.185287,64.29212200000001,0 -149.185196,64.291588,0 -149.184097,64.29162599999999,0 -149.184128,64.29212200000001,0 -149.185287,64.29212200000001,0
Fort Wainwright This coal fired power and steam plant opened in the 1940s, with major additions This coal fired power and steam plant opened in the 1940s, with major additions 20 Mw:

The Fort Wainwright Central Heat and Power Plant (CHPP) is the largest coal-fired power plant owned by the U.S. military. It was first constructed in the 1940's, and has been modified extensively over time. This co-generation plant uses around 230,000 tons of coal per year and can produces up to 20 Mw of electricity as well as steam for heating.

In 1999 this plant was fined over $16 million by the EPA for violation of the Clean Air Act, which at the time was the largest fine levied by the EPA against a Department of Defense installation. Around this same period, Fort Wainwright was designated as Superfund Site for contamination of soil and groundwater with coal, petroleum and pesticide wastes. However, the site is currently in compliance with EPA regulations. In 2007, an air-cooled condenser was added to the plant to the problem of generating ice fog near the cooling pond in the winter that affected visibility on the Richardson Highway.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin_maps1 1 -147.649994,64.825897,0 -147.650009,64.825684,0 -147.650421,64.82564499999999,0 -147.650345,64.825333,0 -147.650055,64.825333,0 -147.650009,64.825226,0 -147.648117,64.825233,0 -147.648148,64.82585899999999,0 -147.649994,64.825897,0
Proposed Proposed Power and/or Heat 1 PowerPlantPips Emma Creek Power Plant Proposal 200 MW:
The Emma Creek Coal Power proposal was an early 1990s proposal by Usibelli Coal Mine that has never gotten past the conception stage.

This large coal-fired power plant was to be located near Usibelli's Jumbo Dome lease tract. At a proposed $420 million (in 1992 dollars), this plant would have produced more power than all of the existing coal-fired plants in Alaska combined. It was projected to use 1.5 million tons of coal per year. The primary advantage of a power plant located at this site would be reduced transportation costs of the fuel and of waste back to the mine site for burial, but the power would also have to be transported a significant distance to consumers in Fairbanks and Anchorage. The project has met with a mixed and mostly lukewarm response from power companies.

]]>
-148.7325271276233 64.00459165828775 0 -0.03730300448982932 0 7865.666211238589 relativeToGround relativeToSeaFloor #msn_ylw-pushpin -148.7340410510913,64.01552745125227,0
Healy Coal plant #2 (Inactive) 0 Mw (Healy Coal Plant #2) This plant was designed to deliver 50 Mw of electrici 0 Mw (Healy Coal Plant #2) This plant was designed to deliver 50 Mw of electrici 50 MW:
The experimental Healy Coal Power #2 (Healy Clean Coal) plant, is a coal-fired power plant which ran during a brief period from 1998 to 1999, but has been shut down ever since due to a legal dispute. The plant went offline almost 80 times during the first year of operation, resulting in significant power fluctuations and outages.

In 1989 the Department of Energy (DOE) chose Healy, Alaska as the site of an experimental plant known as the Healy Clean Coal Plant (HCCP) to burn "waste coal" as part of their "Clean Coal Technology Program". Waste coal typically consists of either leftovers from coal processing or coal that would otherwise be considered refuse. Construction of the HCCP was paid for by the DOE ($117 million), the Alaska Legislature ($25 million), the Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA, $126 million), as well as the Golden Valley Electric Association, serving the Fairbanks area (GVEA, $9 million) and Usibelli Coal Mine Inc. ($3 million).

While this plant met all existing emission regulations in 1999, there have been many technological and regulatory advances since then, and this plant would now be considered no cleaner than a conventional coal-fired plant.

The plant was shut down in 2000 in the wake of a legal dispute between AIDEA and GVEA. In January 2009, GVEA agreed to purchase and takeover operation of the plant and anticipated re-opening the plant by 2010-2011. When this deal was being constructed, the Homer Electric Association (HEA) had agreed in principle to buy 50% of the power produced by the plant starting in 2014. However, in May 2009 the HEA decided to abandon all efforts relating to HCCP , due to price concerns and member opposition. As yet it is unclear what effect this will have on the future of the plant.

]]>
-148.934845 63.856045 0 0.791265 0 2447.345215 relativeToGround #msn_ylw-pushpin -148.950775,63.855049,0
PowerPlant Outlines Emma Creek Plant Reservoir Proposal Proposed reservoir for the Emma Creek Power Plant proposal. #msn_ylw-pushpin0 1 -148.7481839106881,64.01268119777741,0 -148.7501859782168,64.01217248405892,0 -148.7528765826073,64.01240029859537,0 -148.7536996953852,64.01130172972336,0 -148.7581433032135,64.01121242433824,0 -148.7563305428596,64.01092632008734,0 -148.7550113977045,64.01056575724434,0 -148.756505928716,64.00917884498558,0 -148.7589857693055,64.00844592597714,0 -148.7617913345748,64.00778608832354,0 -148.7619614713244,64.00705791626667,0 -148.7649244621884,64.00676298263153,0 -148.7688654528734,64.00588568511543,0 -148.7721395714821,64.00580980703047,0 -148.7788382524337,64.00522349078456,0 -148.7761942126905,64.00529757154492,0 -148.7714493418842,64.00530123655125,0 -148.7680438225032,64.00530456797904,0 -148.7662393150693,64.00545152412759,0 -148.7639402151649,64.00589042355446,0 -148.7631148886569,64.00494400416582,0 -148.7619314151175,64.00407057139432,0 -148.7607438138498,64.00341674565257,0 -148.7581305275849,64.00341603882266,0 -148.7551942485001,64.00421814562938,0 -148.7521985932921,64.00407321273589,0 -148.7507015474833,64.00487765245087,0 -148.7477045490464,64.0056829018244,0 -148.7467048961256,64.00677945775007,0 -148.7437035072191,64.00751113340299,0 -148.7390356078178,64.00853537945645,0 -148.7348686467113,64.00970481492425,0 -148.7446891463657,64.01348384528615,0 -148.7481839106881,64.01268119777741,0 Healy Coal Plant #2 This coal fired power plant was designed to implement experimental NOx and SOx s This coal fired power plant was designed to implement experimental NOx and SOx s 50 MW:
The experimental Healy Coal Power #2 (Healy Clean Coal) plant, is a coal-fired power plant which ran during a brief period from 1998 to 1999, but has been shut down ever since due to a legal dispute. The plant went offline almost 80 times during the first year of operation, resulting in significant power fluctuations and outages.

In 1989 the Department of Energy (DOE) chose Healy, Alaska as the site of an experimental plant known as the Healy Clean Coal Plant (HCCP) to burn "waste coal" as part of their "Clean Coal Technology Program". Waste coal typically consists of either leftovers from coal processing or coal that would otherwise be considered refuse. Construction of the HCCP was paid for by the DOE ($117 million), the Alaska Legislature ($25 million), the Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA, $126 million), as well as the Golden Valley Electric Association, serving the Fairbanks area (GVEA, $9 million) and Usibelli Coal Mine Inc. ($3 million).

While this plant met all existing emission regulations in 1999, there have been many technological and regulatory advances since then, and this plant would now be considered no cleaner than a conventional coal-fired plant.

The plant was shut down in 2000 in the wake of a legal dispute between AIDEA and GVEA. In January 2009, GVEA agreed to purchase and takeover operation of the plant and anticipated re-opening the plant by 2010-2011. When this deal was being constructed, the Homer Electric Association (HEA) had agreed in principle to buy 50% of the power produced by the plant starting in 2014. However, in May 2009 the HEA decided to abandon all efforts relating to HCCP , due to price concerns and member opposition. As yet it is unclear what effect this will have on the future of the plant.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin3120 1 -148.950806,63.85551099999999,0 -148.95166,63.855064,0 -148.951813,63.854576,0 -148.951416,63.85448099999999,0 -148.950989,63.854538,0 -148.950333,63.854778,0 -148.949753,63.855213,0 -148.950806,63.85551099999999,0
Coal to Liquids Power and Heat Healy Coal-to-Liquids proposal The Healy Coal-to-Liquids plant is a proposed 14,600 barrel (around 7300 tons of coal) per day coal-to-liquids plant near the Usibelli coal mine. It would supply liquid fuels to refineries within Alaska.

This 2007 proposal grew directly out of the planned Beluga CTL project when it was found that the subbituminous coal found at Usibelli coal mine shared almost identical properties with the coal found at the proposed Chuitna strip mine near Beluga. Therefore this plant would use the same integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) technology as proposed for the Beluga CTL project. However, since the coal would come from the existing Usibelli mine, this project is not dependent on the creation of a new mine at Chuitna.

This proposal investigated the possibility of carbon capture and storage (CCS) using nearby unmineable coal beds for CO2 storage, but concluded that unless mandated by law CCS would not be economically feasible at the site. Therefore any fuel derived from a Healy CTL plant would have a much higher impact on global warming than conventional oil-based fuels.

]]>
-148.7289222901464 63.98710954432241 0 -0.03406883776012521 0 25954.77793446033 relativeToGround relativeToSeaFloor #msn_ylw-pushpin1 -148.7333865110353,64.01522729340668,0
Fairbanks Coal-to-Liquids proposal Fairbanks CTL Project (Proposal): A proposal for a plant that would produce jet fuel from coal to supply military bases near Fairbanks, primarily Eielson Air Force Base. If built, this facility might supply 20,000-40,000 barrels per day.

In 2008 the US Senate Appropriations Committee approved $10 million towards this project. The plant itself is expected to cost several billion dollars, which doesn't cover carbon capture technology, transportation costs of coal or fuel (including the creation of a new railroad line from Healy), or the creation of new hookups to the electrical grid.

This facility would require a 500-600 megawatt traditional coal-fired plant to power the operation, with some of this power expected to be sold back to the grid. As a conventional pulverized coal plant, like others in Alaska, it alone may release 1.5 million metric tons of the greenhouse gas CO2 per year and face a significant increase in operating costs due to a possible carbon tax.

In total, this facility would require 6-11 million tons of coal per year, which is four to eight times what Alaska's only coal mine, Usibelli Coal Mine, currently produces. The proposed Chuitna Coal mine might provide some coal from its estimated 12 million tons of coal per year, though this capacity might be used for the proposed Beluga CTL plant instead.

]]>
-147.1224231780294 64.70288062609301 0 1.391508948463821 0 33129.5901536079 relativeToGround #msn_ylw-pushpin1 -147.0424480727628,64.65169263730512,0
Beluga Coal-to-Liquids proposal 400 Mw (Chuitna CTL waste heat) If the Chuitna coal mine is developed a giant co 400 Mw (Chuitna CTL waste heat) If the Chuitna coal mine is developed a giant co Beluga CTL Project (Proposal): A proposal for a plant that would produce liquid fuels from coal, dependent on the construction of the proposed Chuitna mine.

This facility has been suggested as an 80,000 barrels (approximately 40,000 tons of coal) per day integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) plant called "Alaska Natural Resources to Liquids", at an estimated cost at $5 billion in 2006. The initial $1.5 million feasibility study has been completed, but the project is still in the idea stage, with no firm plans or permit applications.

This facility would theoretically offset some of the cost of carbon capture and sequestration by pumping the excess CO2 into existing nearby oil and gas fields to enhance yields of these fossil fuels. However, a feasibility analysis undertaken for the failed Kenai Blue Sky Project examined the CO2 storage and/or recovery options for Cook Inlet and determined that under most projections this wouldn't be economically viable.

]]>
-151.16864 61.15617 0 -1.186658 0 11938.091797 relativeToGround #msn_ylw-pushpin1 -151.16803,61.15486900000001,0