ProposedCoalPower.kml normal #sn_yellow11 highlight #sn_yellow10 Proposed Power and/or Heat PowerPlantPips 1 Emma Creek proposed power plant 200 Mw (Emma Creek) This proposed mine-mouth coal fired power plant would be bui 200 Mw (Emma Creek) This proposed mine-mouth coal fired power plant would be bui 200 MW:
The Emma Creek Coal Power proposal was an early 1990s proposal by Usibelli Coal Mine that has never gotten past the conception stage.

This large coal-fired power plant was to be located near Usibelli's Jumbo Dome lease tract. At a proposed $420 million (in 1992 dollars), this plant would have produced more power than all of the existing coal-fired plants in Alaska combined. It was projected to use 1.5 million tons of coal per year. The primary advantage of a power plant located at this site would be reduced transportation costs of the fuel and of waste back to the mine site for burial, but the power would also have to be transported a significant distance to consumers in Fairbanks and Anchorage. The project has met with a mixed and mostly lukewarm response from power companies.

]]>
-148.702957 63.970161 0 36333.351562 0 0.256744 #sn_yellow1 -148.702957,63.970161,0
Healy Coal plant #2 (Inactive) 0 Mw (Healy Coal Plant #2) This plant was designed to deliver 50 Mw of electrici 0 Mw (Healy Coal Plant #2) This plant was designed to deliver 50 Mw of electrici 50 MW:
The experimental Healy Coal Power #2 (Healy Clean Coal) plant, is a coal-fired power plant which ran during a brief period from 1998 to 1999, but has been shut down ever since due to a legal dispute. The plant went offline almost 80 times during the first year of operation, resulting in significant power fluctuations and outages.

In 1989 the Department of Energy (DOE) chose Healy, Alaska as the site of an experimental plant known as the Healy Clean Coal Plant (HCCP) to burn "waste coal" as part of their "Clean Coal Technology Program". Waste coal typically consists of either leftovers from coal processing or coal that would otherwise be considered refuse. Construction of the HCCP was paid for by the DOE ($117 million), the Alaska Legislature ($25 million), the Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA, $126 million), as well as the Golden Valley Electric Association, serving the Fairbanks area (GVEA, $9 million) and Usibelli Coal Mine Inc. ($3 million).

While this plant met all existing emission regulations in 1999, there have been many technological and regulatory advances since then, and this plant would now be considered no cleaner than a conventional coal-fired plant.

The plant was shut down in 2000 in the wake of a legal dispute between AIDEA and GVEA. In January 2009, GVEA agreed to purchase and takeover operation of the plant and anticipated re-opening the plant by 2010-2011. When this deal was being constructed, the Homer Electric Association (HEA) had agreed in principle to buy 50% of the power produced by the plant starting in 2014. However, in May 2009 the HEA decided to abandon all efforts relating to HCCP , due to price concerns and member opposition. As yet it is unclear what effect this will have on the future of the plant.

]]>
-148.934845 63.856045 0 2447.345215 0 0.791265 relativeToGround #sn_yellow1 -148.950775,63.855049,0
PowerPlant Outlines Healy Coal Plant #2 This coal fired power plant was designed to implement experimental NOx and SOx s This coal fired power plant was designed to implement experimental NOx and SOx s 50 MW:
The experimental Healy Coal Power #2 (Healy Clean Coal) plant, is a coal-fired power plant which ran during a brief period from 1998 to 1999, but has been shut down ever since due to a legal dispute. The plant went offline almost 80 times during the first year of operation, resulting in significant power fluctuations and outages.

In 1989 the Department of Energy (DOE) chose Healy, Alaska as the site of an experimental plant known as the Healy Clean Coal Plant (HCCP) to burn "waste coal" as part of their "Clean Coal Technology Program". Waste coal typically consists of either leftovers from coal processing or coal that would otherwise be considered refuse. Construction of the HCCP was paid for by the DOE ($117 million), the Alaska Legislature ($25 million), the Industrial Development and Export Authority (AIDEA, $126 million), as well as the Golden Valley Electric Association, serving the Fairbanks area (GVEA, $9 million) and Usibelli Coal Mine Inc. ($3 million).

While this plant met all existing emission regulations in 1999, there have been many technological and regulatory advances since then, and this plant would now be considered no cleaner than a conventional coal-fired plant.

The plant was shut down in 2000 in the wake of a legal dispute between AIDEA and GVEA. In January 2009, GVEA agreed to purchase and takeover operation of the plant and anticipated re-opening the plant by 2010-2011. When this deal was being constructed, the Homer Electric Association (HEA) had agreed in principle to buy 50% of the power produced by the plant starting in 2014. However, in May 2009 the HEA decided to abandon all efforts relating to HCCP , due to price concerns and member opposition. As yet it is unclear what effect this will have on the future of the plant.

]]>
#sn_ylw-pushpin3 1 -148.950806,63.85551099999999,0 -148.95166,63.855064,0 -148.951813,63.854576,0 -148.951416,63.85448099999999,0 -148.950989,63.854538,0 -148.950333,63.854778,0 -148.949753,63.855213,0 -148.950806,63.85551099999999,0