Ground Truth Trekking
download a pdf of this article

Opposition to Pebble

Last Modified: 21st March 2013

Elders meet

Native elders from Nondalton and Dillingham discuss areas where they hunt for caribou.

Project Opposition

The proposed Pebble mine is extraordinarily controversial.  Sitting at the center of a storm of publicity and political efforts, it has generated intense opposition on an Alaskan and even national level.  Although mostly driven by local residents (native and non-native), fishermen, and conservation organizations, opposition to the mine has grown to include some shareholders in the mining company itself, as well as consumers of both seafood and jewelery.

In the Bristol Bay region, where the mine would be located, most communities and governmental bodies are opposed to the project (around 20 native corporations, village councils, tribes, and cities). Notably, this includes the regional level native organizations: the Bristol Bay Native Corporation and the Bristol Bay Native Association. Supporters of the mine include the village of Iliamna, where Pebble exploration efforts are based, the Alaska Peninsula and Twin Hills Native Corporations, and the tribes of South Naknek and King Salmon.

Several Alaska-based groups exist primarily to oppose the Pebble Project, including Nunamta Aulukestai ("Caretakers of the Land"), the Renewable Resources Coalition, the Save Bristol Bay, Rebels to the Pebble, Stop Pebble Mine, and Our Bristol Bay. Organizations involved in sport and commercial fishing, such as the Alaska Wilderness Recreation and Tourism Association, the Alaska Independent Fishermen's Marketing Association and "Commericial Fishermen for Bristol Bay" have also been heavily involved.  Some established Alaskan conservation organizations have also taken an official stance against the mine, most importantly  the Alaska Conservation Foundation (ACF) and Trustees for Alaska.

While Pebble opposition is primarily Alaska based (the prospect sits on Alaska state land), the issue has attracted a fair amount of national media attention in recent years. The national organization Trout Unlimited has been heavily involved in fighting the proposal.  Other national groups such as the Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC)Wild Salmon Center, and even a group of shareholders in Anglo American have voiced opposition to the project.

Another facet to the opposition has been directed at consumers.  Over 60 jewelers have signed the "Bristol Bay Protection Pledge" which supports protection of Bristol Bay Fisheries through the banning of mining in the area.  Likewise a number of Seattle-area chefs have joined a campaign to serve wild salmon while highlighting the risks of the mine.  Lastly several hundred clothing companies, equipment companies, and outfitters have announced opposition to the project.

Drill slurry outfall onto tundra

Drill rig hose dumping grey slurry into the tundra, Pebble East.

Legal and Political Opposition

Legal challenges to the Bristol Bay Area Plan (designating the site for mining) and Pebble's exploration permits have been brought by the Nondalton Tribal Council and Nunamta Aulukestai. Several bills have been brought before the legislature to protect the area, including a proposal turning the area into a game refuge, and a proposal to protect salmon spawning waters of Bristol Bay. None have passed. Both sides of the Pebble controversy spent heavily on advertising over the unsuccessful Alaska Clean Water Initiative on the 2008 ballot, which would have strictly limited pollution by new large mines.  A number of groups have petitioned the EPA to designate the Koktuli River as a "Outstanding National Resource Water". 

The American Rivers organization has classified the Bristol Bay rivers among the country's most endangered rivers as a result of the mine proposal.   A partial legal victory was obtained by mine opponents in 2011 when Pebble was fined $45,000 for water-related violations during exploration though the plaintiffs had attempted to prove much larger damages.

In October 2011 the Lake and Peninsula Borough passed an ordinance that would functionally ban open-bit mining in the Borough, that ordinance is currently being challenged in court.  A statewide ballot initiative with the potential to veto the Pebble project began in December 2012, with sponsors hoping to have the issue on the ballot by December 2013.

At the request of a coalition of local groups and environmental organizations, the EPA launched a "Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment" in 2012 which concluded that mining posed a significant risk to fisheries in the area.  It is possible that the EPA could subsequently block the mine under provisions in the Clean Water Act (the so-called "veto authority" granted by section 404(c)).

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial

Attribution and Copyright info

By David CoilErin McKittrickBretwood HigmanGround Truth Trekking

Content on this page is available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial license. For commercial uses please contact us.

Date Created: 23rd November 2012